.jpg)
What this covers
Feasibility is the screen. You bring us a material, a process, or a technology you believe has environmental merit. We determine whether it can survive the full pipeline: field performance, cost competitiveness, contractor adoption, and carbon accounting rigour.
We test on live roads under real traffic. We compare cost per lane-mile against the incumbent. We assess whether the method can be built with equipment already in the market. If it passes, we map the pathway to LCA, EPD, methodology, or all three.
If it doesn't pass, we tell you where and why. Early clarity saves time and money.
Our approach
Material screening
Characterise the material or process. Laboratory testing for mix design, compatibility, and baseline performance indicators.
Field trials
Build instrumented trial sections on live roads. Monitor under real traffic, weather, and construction conditions over months.
Cost and constructability
Compare cost per lane-mile against incumbent methods. Assess equipment requirements, contractor readiness, and specification pathways.
Pathway mapping
Identify which registry pathway fits. Map data requirements for LCA, EPD, and methodology development. Define kill criteria and go/no-go decision points.
.jpg)
Scope
-
Materials characterisation and mix design
-
Laboratory testing programmes
-
Field trial sections and instrumentation on live roads
-
Scale-up and constructability assessment
-
Equipment and contractor readiness review
-
Cost per lane-mile comparison vs. incumbent methods
-
Specification pathway mapping (FHWA, state DOT, municipal)
-
Registry pathway and data requirement identification
-
Commercial viability assessment


Mix design report
Full characterisation of material properties, optimised mix formulae, and performance benchmarks.

Trial monitoring data
Instrumented field data from live road sections including deflection, density, and condition over time.

Constructability assessment
Equipment requirements, contractor skill gaps, and deployment readiness across target markets.

Cost comparison memo
Lane-mile cost comparison against hot mix and warm mix incumbent methods, including lifecycle projections.

Specification language
Draft specification text suitable for FHWA, state DOT, or municipal procurement adoption.

Pathway recommendation
Go/no-go assessment with mapped pathway to LCA, EPD, methodology, or termination with documented reasoning.
Duration
6–18 months
When to engage
You have a material or process and need to know if it works at scale
For
Technology developers, material suppliers, and innovation teams evaluating new methods


